ArticleScientific reports2025
Phylodynamic assessment of SNP distances from whole genome sequencing for determining Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals high-risk ESBL and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales on maternity ward surfaces in Cameroon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using genomic epidemiology and geographic activity spaces to investigate tuberculosis outbreaks in Botswana.International journal of health geographics · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Framework for the Network Analysis of Transmission Dynamics in Infectious Disease.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Screening for heterogeneous drug resistance in tuberculosis and its impact on clinical prognosis: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2026Review
- Nationwide whole-genome sequencing reveals local transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Poland, 2003-2020.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Transmission characteristics of tuberculosis in the high-TB-burden region of Southwest China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Empowering tuberculosis genomic surveillance in Limpopo, South Africa through capacity building.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global tuberculosis (TB) epidemic is driven by primary transmission. Pathogen genome sequencing is increasingly used in molecular epidemiology and outbreak investigations. Based on contact tracing and epidemiological links, Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) cut-offs, ranging from 3 to 12 SNPs, identify probable transmission clusters or exclude direct transmission. However, contact tracing can be limited by recall bias and inconsistent methodologies across TB settings. We propose phylodynamic models, i.e. methods to infer transmission processes from pathogen genomes and associated epidemiological data, as an alternative reference to infer transmission events. We analyzed 2,008 whole-genome sequences from Dutch TB patients collected from 2015 to 2019. Genetic clusters were defined within a 20-SNP range, and the phylodynamic model phybreak was employed to infer transmission. Probable transmission SNP cut-offs were assessed by the proportion of inferred transmission events with a SNP distance below these cut-offs. A total of 79 clusters were identified, with a median size of 4 isolates (IQR = 3-8). A SNP cut-off of 4 captured 98% of inferred transmission events while reducing pairs without transmission links. A cut-off beyond 12 SNPs effectively excluded transmission. Phylodynamic approaches provide a valuable alternative to contact tracing for defining SNP cut-offs, allowing for a more precise assessment of transmission events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.