ArticleScientific reports2025
Ecotoxic effect of mycogenic silver nanoparticles in water and soil environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologically Mediated Nanoparticle Synthesis as a Potential Green Strategy: Principles, Methods, and Pharmaceutical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Hyperbranched Polymer Dendrimers Embedded in Electrospun Nanofibers for Safe and Sustainable Antibacterial Filtration Materials.Polymers · 2026Article
- Application of TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Microbial-Based Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Comparative Review of Bacteria- and Fungi-Mediated Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Green-Synthesized Nanomaterials for Water Disinfection: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Environmental Safety.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multifunctional protective strategies for wooden cultural heritage: antimicrobial efficacy of polyacrylic resins, siloxane coupling agents, and silver nanoparticles.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are one of the most widely used nanomaterials due to their antimicrobial properties. Among the AgNPs synthesis methods, the biological route has become preferable because of its efficiency and eco-friendly character. Filamentous fungi can be successfully used in biosynthesis of AgNPs. The extensive application of AgNPs and their ever increasing production raise concerns about their environmental safety. AgNPs can be released during manufacturing processes or by leaching from AgNPs-supplemented products, and then enter the natural environment. Water and soil ecosystems are most exposed to the AgNPs presence. The present study aimed at evaluating the ecotoxicological potential of AgNPs derived from Gloeophyllum striatum fungus. The assessment was performed using organisms from water and soil ecosystems. Our results suggest that the presence of AgNPs can threaten the organisms inhabiting exposed ecosystems and the adverse effects of AgNPs differ depending on the organism species. Freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna was found to be the most sensitive among the tested species with EC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.