ArticleScientific reports2025
Combining meta and ensemble learning to classify EEG for seizure detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder Prediction Based on AI-Assisted EEG Dynamic Features in Anesthetized Mice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A transparent AI assurance and benchmarking framework for EEG seizure detection on TUSZ seeded with a reproducible gradient-boosting ensemble.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Method for Explainable Epileptic Seizure Detection Through Wavelet Transforms Obtained by Electroencephalogram-Based Audio Recordings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite two decades of extensive research into electroencephalogram (EEG)-based automated seizure detection analysis, the persistent imbalance between seizure and non-seizure categories remains a significant challenge. This study integrated meta-sampling with an ensemble classifier to address the issue of imbalanced classification existing in seizure detection. In this framework, a meta-sampler was employed to autonomously acquire undersampling strategies from EEG data. During each iteration, the meta-sampler interacted with the external environment on a single occasion with the objective of deriving an optimal sampling strategy through this interactive learning process. It was anticipated that optimal sampling strategies would be derived through interactive learning. And then the soft Actor-Critic algorithm was employed to address the non-differentiable optimization issue associated with the meta-sampler. Consequently, this framework adaptively selected training EEG data, and learned effective cascaded integrated classifiers from unbalanced epileptic EEG data. Besides, the time domain, nonlinear and entropy-based EEG features were extracted from five frequency bands (δ, θ, α, β, and γ) and were selected by Semi-JMI to be fed into this imbalanced classification framework. The proposed detection system achieved a sensitivity of 92.58%, a specificity of 92.51%, and an accuracy of 92.52% on the scalp EEG dataset. On the intracranial EEG dataset, the average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.56%, 98.82%, and 98.7%, respectively. The experimental comparisons demonstrated that the system outperformed other state-of-the-art methods, and showed robustness in the face of label corruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.