ArticleNature communications2025
Ultrafast fMRI reveals serial queuing of information processing during multitasking in the human brain.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing Is Everything: How Subtle Timing Changes in MRI Echo Planar Imaging Can Significantly Alter Mechanical Vibrations and Sound Level.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Trial-level sequence modeling reveals hidden dynamics of dual-task interference.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human brain is heralded for its massive parallel processing capacity, yet influential cognitive models suggest that there is a central bottleneck of information processing distinct from perceptual and motor stages that limits our ability to carry out two cognitively demanding tasks at once, resulting in the serial queuing of task information processing. Here we used ultrafast (199 ms TR), high-field (7T) fMRI with multivariate analyses to distinguish brain activity between two arbitrary sensorimotor response selection tasks when the tasks were temporally overlapping. We observed serial processing of task-specific activity in the fronto-parietal multiple-demand (MD) network, while processing in earlier sensory stages unfolded largely in parallel. Moreover, the MD network combined with modality-specific motor areas to define the functional characteristic of the central bottleneck at the stage of response selection. These results provide direct neural evidence for serial queuing of information processing and pinpoint the neural substrates undergirding the central bottleneck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.