Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155548›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

The role of postoperative sucralfate in adults following tonsillectomy and sleep surgery: a systematic review.

Lauren R McCray, Erin E Briggs, Jaimin J Patel, Shaun A Nguyen, Noah Parker

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren R McCrayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Room 1133, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425-5500, USA. mccrayla@musc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2700-2721
Erin E BriggsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Room 1133, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425-5500, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2691-9074
Jaimin J PatelIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Room 1133, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425-5500, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-4571
Noah ParkerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the efficacy of topical sucralfate on postoperative recovery following oropharyngeal surgery in adults using pain scales, analgesic use, and various self-reported measures.

methodsCINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases were searched from inception through July 3, 2024. Randomized controlled trials related to topical sucralfate following oropharyngeal surgery in patients at least 18 years old were included. Study protocols for clinical trials, abstracts, and non-English language articles were excluded. Two authors extracted data, and disagreements were resolved with a third party if needed. Risk of bias was assessed according to Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results of included studies and a narrative summary of our findings are presented through descriptive statistics (frequency (%) for categorical variables and mean (range) for continuous variables).

resultsFour studies (n = 185) pertaining to topical sucralfate and post-operative outcomes in an adult population were included. The sucralfate group had a mean age of 40.08 vs. 37.50 for the control group. The sucralfate group had a significantly higher reduction in pain scores than the control group. The sucralfate group also had statistically significant improvements in otalgia, strength, diet tolerance, and reduction in analgesic use compared to the control group in two of the four studies.

conclusionsOropharyngeal surgery is commonly performed in adults despite having a morbid recovery process. The literature shows promising results with the use of sucralfate in the reduction of post-operative pain in adults; however, further investigation is warranted given the limited scope of the literature.

Indexed as

Postoperative CarePostoperative PainSucralfateTonsillectomyAdministration, TopicalAdultHumansPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSucralfateOropharynxQuality of lifeSucralfateSystematic reviewTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID40155548
PMCPMC12423154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.