Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155502›Full record

SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

The use of preoperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tyler McKechnie, Tania Kazi, Ghazal Jessani, Victoria Shi, Niv Sne, Aristithes Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Cagla Eskicioglu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The use of preoperative enteral immunonutrition in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Prehabilitation and postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgery: an umbrella review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tyler McKechnieDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-4096
Tania KaziDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-2360-2159
Ghazal JessaniMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Victoria ShiMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-2102-1498
Niv SneDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Aristithes DoumourasDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dennis HongDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cagla EskiciogluDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3920-066X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare adult patients receiving enteral immunonutrition prior to elective colorectal surgery with those receiving conventional preoperative nutrition.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to March 2024. Articles were included if they were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies evaluating adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery comparing preoperative enteral immunonutrition with conventional preoperative nutrition protocols. Main outcomes of interest included surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, overall postoperative morbidity and postoperative length of stay. An inverse variance random effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. The GRADE approach was conducted to assess quality of evidence.

resultsAfter reviewing 2508 relevant citations, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1521 patients (mean age 64.9 ± 10.0 years, 49.4% women) received preoperative immunonutrition and 1816 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 11.0 years, 52.1% women) received conventional preoperative nutrition. Across seven studies, there was a non-significant 30% relative risk reduction of surgical site infection (risk ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.11, P = 0.13, I

conclusionWhile point estimates suggest a likely benefit associated with preoperative enteral immunonutrition, wide corresponding 95% CIs suggest uncertainty remains. Further prospective study is warranted.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsElective Surgical ProceduresEnteral NutritionPreoperative CareAgedAnastomotic LeakFemaleHumansImmunonutrition DietLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound Infectioncolorectal cancercolorectal surgeryimmunonutritionpreoperative nutritionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40155502
PMCPMC11953066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.