ArticleScientific reports2025
The interpretable machine learning model for depression associated with heavy metals via EMR mining method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- SYNERGY-VAE: An explainable generative deep learning framework for discovering depression subgroups from multimodal population health data.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Research of Heavy Metal(loid)s-Related Risk: A Scoping Review of Methodology.Toxics · 2026Review
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Burden and risk factors of depression in seniors from 1990 to 2021: a multi-database study based on EMR mining methods.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited research exists on the association between depression and heavy metal exposure. This study aims to develop an interpretable and efficient machine learning (ML) model with robust performance to identify depression linked to heavy metal exposure. Data were derived from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning from 2013 to March 2020. We constructed 5 ML models to detect depression based on heavy metal exposure and assessed their performance using 10 discrimination metrics. The optimal model was selected after parameter tuning with a Genetic Algorithm (GA). To enhance the interpretability of the model's predictions, we applied SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithms. The study included 19,368 participants. The highest-performing model, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) algorithm optimized with GA, identified depression using 16 heavy metal indicators (AUC: 0.686; 95% CI: 0.68-0.69; accuracy: 97.1%). SHAP analysis revealed that elevated blood cadmium levels had a positive influence on the model's prediction of depression, while urine concentrations of barium, thallium, tin, manganese, antimony, lead, and tungsten, along with blood levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, selenium, and manganese, showed a negative influence. In conclusion, the study successfully utilized an efficient and robust GA-XGB model to identify depression linked to heavy metal exposure, supported by SHAP and LIME explanations. Blood cadmium was positively correlated with depression, whereas barium, thallium, tin, manganese, antimony, lead, and tungsten in urine, along with lead, cadmium, mercury, selenium, and manganese in blood, were negatively correlated with depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.