Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing convolutional neural networks in electroencephalogram driver drowsiness detection using human inspired optimizers.

Anupam Yadav, Rifat Hussain, Madhu Shukla, Jayaprakash B, Rishiv Kalia, S Prince Mary, Chou-Yi Hsu, Manoj Kumar Mishra, Kashif Saleem, Mohammed El-Meligy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anupam YadavDepartment of Computer Engineering and Application, GLA University, Mathura, Chaumuhan, 281406, India.
Rifat HussainCollege of Administrative Sciences, Applied Science University, Al Eker, Bahrain.
Madhu ShuklaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Marwadi University Research Center, Faculty of Engineering & Technology Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360003, India.
Jayaprakash BDepartment of Computer Science & IT, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Rishiv KaliaCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.
S Prince MaryDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chou-Yi HsuThunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University, Tempe Campus, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Manoj Kumar MishraSalale University, Fitche, Ethiopia. mkmishra@slu.edu.et.
Kashif SaleemDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer & Information Sciences, King Saud University, 11543, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed El-MeligyJadara University Research Center, Jadara University, PO Box 733, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driver drowsiness is a significant safety concern, contributing to numerous traffic accidents. To address this issue, researchers have explored electroencephalogram (EEG)-based detection systems. Due to the high-dimensional nature of EEG signals and the subtle temporal patterns of drowsiness, there is increasing recognition of the need for deep neural networks (DNNs) to capture the dynamics of drowsy driving better. Meanwhile, optimizing DNNs architectures remains a challenge, as training these models is an NP-hard problem. Meta-heuristic algorithms offer an alternative to traditional gradient-based optimizers for improving DNNs performance. This study investigates the use of two human-inspired algorithms-teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) and student psychology-based optimization (SPBO)-to optimize convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for EEG-based drowsiness detection. Results demonstrate strong predictive performance for both CNN-TLBO and CNN-SPBO, with area under the curve values of 0.926 and 0.920, respectively. TLBO produced a simpler model with 4,145 parameters, whereas SPBO generated a more complex architecture with 264,065 parameters but completed optimization faster (116 vs. 148 min). Despite minor overfitting, SPBO's efficiency makes it a cost-effective solution. In general, our findings contribute to the advancement of driver monitoring systems and road safety while emphasizing the broader role of meta-heuristic techniques in deep learning optimization.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingConvolutional Neural NetworksElectroencephalographySleep StagesAccidents, TrafficAdultAlgorithmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerCNNDriver DrowsinessEEGMeta-heuristic OptimizationSPBOTLBO

Identifiers

PMID40155444
PMCPMC11953301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.