Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155422›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pertinence of contact duration as edge feature for epidemic spread analysis.

Ramya D Shetty, Shrutilipi Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramya D ShettyDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. ramya.d@manipal.edu.
Shrutilipi BhattacharjeeDepartment of Information Technology, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, 575025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying superspreading nodes has attracted greater attention because of its wide practical significance in various applications. Existing studies consider the edges mostly equally while designing the algorithms for the unweighted contact networks, where each connection explicitly shows whether the individuals are in contact or not. It will not consider other relevant information in the context of epidemiology study or infectious disease spread, such as proximity or total time spent between the contact nodes. The recent studies focused on the weighted network, where most of the methods have computed the edge weights by utilizing degree and k-shell measure, which captures the topological structure of the network but not the interaction duration between pair of contacts. In this study, we mainly aim to generate weighted networks to model the pathogen spread by optimal calculation of the edge weight in terms of contact duration (time spent) between individual contacts. Leveraging this interaction duration as the edge weight, we further design a novel technique, namely Real Weighted Influence (RWInf), for identifying the superspreading nodes during an epidemic outbreak. The empirical study revealed that the proposed approach outperforms with an improvement of 0.146-0.473 kendall's score in comparison with baseline approaches.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesContact TracingEpidemicsAlgorithmsDisease OutbreaksHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40155422
PMCPMC11953441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.