ArticleScientific reports2025
C-reactive protein to platelet ratio as an early biomarker in differentiating neonatal late-onset sepsis in neonates with pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Platelet-Based Indexes for Mortality in Sepsis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Staged identification of CAP in fever patients across epidemic environments: modeling & validation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Platelet-to-C-reactive protein ratio stratifies surgical risk and mortality in necrotizing enterocolitis neonates with portal venous gas.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Immunothrombotic Phenotype: Early Inflammatory and Hematologic Markers that Identify Children at Increased Risk of Avascular Necrosis Following Septic Arthritis.JB & JS open accessArticle
- Prenatal, Perinatal, and Hematological Predictors of Severe Respiratory Failure in Neonatal Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonates with pneumonia (NWP) may experience unidentified life-threatening sepsis, yet distinguishing NWP from neonates with sepsis (NWS) based solely on clinical presentation remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the C-reactive protein to platelet ratio (CPR) in distinguishing neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS) among NWPs. From February 2016 to March 2022, a total of 1385 NWPs aged over 3 days were included. Of these, 174 neonates with confirmed positive blood cultures were categorized into the sepsis cohort, while the remainder formed the pneumonia cohort. All clinical data were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records. CPR was calculated as the ratio of C-reactive protein levels to platelet count. Independent risk factors (IRFs) for neonatal LOS were identified through multivariate logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of CPR in identifying LOS among NWPs was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve metrics. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 24.0 and MedCalc version 15.2.2. Neonates with NWS demonstrated significantly higher CPR compared to those with NWP alone. Further analysis revealed a notably increased incidence of sepsis among neonates exhibiting elevated CPR levels relative to those with lower values. Correlation analysis identified a direct association between CPR and elevated procalcitonin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen levels, as well as prolonged hospitalization. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified CPR as an IRF for late-onset NWS. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that CPR outperformed CRP and platelet count individually in diagnosing NWS, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 85%. CPR serves as an effective initial diagnostic marker with superior accuracy in distinguishing delayed NWS from NWP compared to CRP and platelet count alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.