Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155387›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Soft-computing models for predicting plastic viscosity and interface yield stress of fresh concrete.

Waleed Bin Inqiad, Muhammad Faisal Javed, Deema Mohammed Alsekait, Naseer Muhammad Khan, Majid Khan, Fahid Aslam, Diaa Salama Abd Elminaam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waleed Bin InqiadSchool of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology, 17, Beijing, 100083, China.
Muhammad Faisal JavedDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, 23640, Pakistan. arbabfaisal@giki.edu.pk.
Deema Mohammed AlsekaitDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. Dmalsekait@pnu.edu.sa.
Naseer Muhammad KhanDepartment of Sustainable Advanced Geomechanical Engineering, Military College of Engineering (MCE), National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Majid KhanSchool of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology, 17, Beijing, 100083, China. majid@ustb.edu.cn.
Fahid AslamDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Diaa Salama Abd ElminaamFaculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Benha University Egypt, Banha, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interface yield stress and plastic viscosity of fresh concrete significantly influences its pumping ability. The accurate determination of these properties needs extensive testing on-site which results in time and resource wastage. Thus, to speed up the process of accurately determining these concrete properties, this study tends to use four machine learning (ML) algorithms including Random Forest Regression (RFR), Gene Expression Programming (GEP), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and a statistical technique Multi Linear Regression (MLR) to develop predictive models for plastic viscosity and interface yield stress of concrete. Out of all employed algorithms, only GEP expressed its output in the form of an empirical equation. The models were developed using data from published literature having six input parameters including cement, water, time after mixing etc. and two output parameters i.e., plastic viscosity and interface yield stress. The performance of the developed algorithms was assessed using several error metrices, k-fold validation, and residual assessment etc. The comparison of results revealed that XGB is the most accurate algorithm to predict plastic viscosity (training [Formula: see text], testing [Formula: see text]) and interface yield stress (training [Formula: see text], testing [Formula: see text]). To get increased insights into the model prediction process, shapely and individual conditional expectation analyses were carried out on the XGB algorithm which highlighted that water, cement, and time after mixing are the most influential parameters to estimate both fresh properties of concrete. In addition, a graphical user interface has been made to efficiently implement the findings of this study in the civil engineering industry.

Indexed as

Gene expression programmingInterface yield stressMachine learningPlastic viscosityShapley additive explanatory analysis

Identifiers

PMID40155387
PMCPMC11953388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.