Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155376›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Modulating competitive adsorption of hybrid self-assembled molecules for efficient wide-bandgap perovskite solar cells and tandems.

Chenyang Shi, Jianan Wang, Xia Lei, Qisen Zhou, Weitao Wang, Zhichun Yang, Sanwan Liu, Jiaqi Zhang, He Zhu, Rui Chen and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chenyang Shi *Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Jianan Wang *Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Xia Lei *Hoffmann Institute of Advanced Material, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Qisen Zhou *Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Weitao Wang *Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 153-8505, Japan.
Zhichun YangState Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1613-5984
Sanwan LiuWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Jiaqi ZhangWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
He ZhuWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Rui ChenWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Yongyan PanWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Zhengtian TanWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Wenguang LiuWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Zhengjing ZhaoHuaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Zihe CaiHuaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaojun QinHuaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhiguo ZhaoHuaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Jingbai LiHoffmann Institute of Advanced Material, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, 518055, China. lijingbai@szpu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-0318
Zonghao LiuWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China. liuzonghao@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-6971
Wei ChenWuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Luoyu Road 1037, Wuhan, 430074, China. wnlochenwei@mail.hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2418-9210

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M731172China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024M751002, GZC20240528National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52473301National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62205187National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) W2412077, U20A20252Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation) 2022CFA093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The employment of self-assembled molecular hybrid could improve buried interface in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, the interplay among hybrid self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) during the deposition process has not been well-studied. Herein, we study the interaction between co-adsorbents and commonly used SAM material, [4-(3,6-dimethyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)butyl]phosphonic acid (Me-4PACz) for wide-bandgap (WBG) PSCs. It is found that the co-adsorbent, 6-aminohexane-1-sulfonic acid (SA) tends to fill the uncovered sites without interference with Me-4PACz, ensuring the formation of a dense hole selective layer. Moreover, the use of SA/Me-4PACz mixed SAMs could effectively reduce the interfacial non-radiative recombination loss, optimize the energy alignment at the buried interface and regulate the crystallization of WBG perovskite. As a result, the 1.77 eV WBG PSCs deliver a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 20.67% (20.21% certified) and an impressive open-circuit voltage (V

Identifiers

PMID40155376
PMCPMC11953228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.