Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40154986›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Caregiver experiences of accessing a child developmental assessment service in a culturally diverse population in Australia: a mixed methods study.

Yvonne Teoh, Pankaj Garg, Nugroho Karyadiguna, Sinthu Vivekanandarajah, Lydia So, Romy Hurwitz, Shanti Raman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yvonne TeohDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia ysl.teoh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4920-594X
Pankaj GargDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-2679
Nugroho KaryadigunaDepartment of Paediatrics, Western Sydney Local Health District, Blacktown and Mount Druitt, New South Wales, Australia.
Sinthu VivekanandarajahDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Lydia SoDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8291-6001
Romy HurwitzDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Shanti RamanDepartment of Community Paediatrics, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4546-3231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile there is a high level of concern among parents about waiting for child developmental services, there is limited research on caregiver perspectives on accessing public developmental diagnostic services, especially for families from culturally diverse backgrounds. We aimed to explore caregiver perspectives and satisfaction after attending a Child Developmental Assessment Service (CDAS) appointment for their child in South Western Sydney, as part of a large quality improvement project.

methodsOver a 6-month period between June and December 2022, we surveyed caregivers after their child's first CDAS appointment, using an adapted caregiver questionnaire that contained Likert scale and free-text responses. We analysed the data using simple descriptive and thematic data analysis.

resultsOf 107 caregiver satisfaction questionnaires completed, almost two-thirds (63%) were from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Over 90% caregivers reported a satisfaction response of 'Agree' to 'Strongly Agree', 88% felt that the assessment was suitable to their child's needs and 85% considered waiting times reasonable. The mean overall caregiver satisfaction score was 4.5 (SD 1.1). About 30% of families had doubts about their child's neurodevelopmental diagnosis. The themes identified from free-text responses were (1) positive caregiver experience; (2) clinician attributes; (3) quality of the service delivery; (4) information received. Caregivers expressed very high levels of satisfaction with the quality of service and clinicians' skills, appreciated enhanced understanding of their child's development and found the assessment helpful.

conclusionsOur study showed surprisingly high levels of caregiver satisfaction in attending a neurodevelopmental assessment service, in a culturally diverse metropolitan setting. Our findings support the importance of providing interpersonal sensitivity and family-centred practice for children with neurodevelopmental difficulties. We need to respond to the families who disagreed with the diagnostic formulation or were dissatisfied with the service, to improve the service quality, using longitudinal evaluation and more in-depth qualitative analysis.

Indexed as

CaregiversChild DevelopmentChild Health ServicesDevelopmental DisabilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityAdultAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCultural DiversityFemaleHumansInfantMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregiversChild HealthEpidemiologyHealth services research

Identifiers

PMID40154986
PMCPMC11956312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.