Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40154833›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2025

Disparities in access to surgical resection in patients with pancreatic cancer - a systematic review.

Michelle M Holland, Hamza Khan, Krisha Amin, Jaspinder S Sanghera, Ioannis Liapis, Nritya Nair, Joshua Richman, Smita Bhatia, Larry R Hearld, Martin J Heslin and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michelle M HollandDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States. Electronic address: mmwahlgren@uabmc.edu.
Hamza KhanDepartment of Surgery, Valley Health System, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Krisha AminDepartment of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States.
Jaspinder S SangheraDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Ioannis LiapisDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Nritya NairDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Joshua RichmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Smita BhatiaInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Larry R HearldDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Martin J HeslinDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Annabelle L FonsecaDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Funding

Surgical Oncology Research Training ProgramT32CA229102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HERBERT CHEN · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Using Modifiable Factors to Predict Risk of non-Guideline Concordant Treatment in Foregut Cancers: A Novel Implementation Science-based approachK23MD018383 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI Annabelle L Fonseca · 2023 to 2026
$647k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229102NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD018383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection is a crucial component of pancreatic cancer treatment. However, multiple disparities in access to surgical resection have been reported. This systematic review aimed to critically assess and summarize these disparities to improve equity in cancer care.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2000 to 2023. Primary research articles from the United States specifically evaluating surgical resection for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma cancer were included. Bias assessment was performed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

resultsA total of 19 studies met the final inclusion criteria. 16 studies reported disparities among minority groups, with Black and Hispanic patients less likely to undergo surgery. 15 studies reported older age being predictive of nonreceipt of surgery. Lower socioeconomic status, reported in 8 studies, and nonprivate insurance, reported in 7 studies, were determined to be independent risk factors for decreased receipt of surgery. Five studies reported that patients treated at community hospitals were less likely to receive surgery, and 4 studies identified being single as an independent risk factor for nonreceipt of surgery. Finally, residence in a rural location, reported in 1 study, and male sex, reported in 1 study, were determined to be predictive of decreased receipt of surgery. DISCUSSION: Various sociodemographic factors influence the access to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer. These factors are proxies for multiple underlying barriers along the continuum of care, some of which may be modifiable. Identifying and understanding these barriers will allow us to develop targeted interventions to improve the delivery of oncologic care.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesBarriers to carePancreatic cancerSurgical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID40154833
PMCPMC12261072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.