Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40154735›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Sex-specific proteomic signatures improve cardiovascular risk prediction for the general population without cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

Ruijie Xie, Tomislav Vlaski, Sha Sha, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruijie XieDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Tomislav VlaskiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sha ShaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: b.schoettker@dkfz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate prediction of 10-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is critical for effective disease prevention and management. Although the SCORE2 model introduced sex-specific algorithms, opportunities remain to further refine prediction.

objectivesTo evaluate whether adding sex-specific proteomic profiles to the SCORE2 model enhances 10-year MACE risk prediction in the large UK Biobank (UKB) cohort.

methodsData from 47,382 UKB participants, aged 40 to 69 years without prior cardiovascular disease or diabetes, were utilized. Proteomic profiling of plasma samples was conducted using the Olink Explore 3072 platform, measuring 2,923 unique proteins, of which 2,085 could be used. Sex-specific Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used for biomarker selection. Model performance was assessed by changes in Harrell's C-index (a measure of discrimination), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI).

resultsDuring 10-year follow-up, 2,163 participants experienced MACE. Overall, 18 proteins were selected by LASSO regression, with 5 of them identified in both sexes, 7 only in males, and 6 only in females. Incorporating these proteins significantly improved the C-index of the SCORE2 model from 0.713 to 0.778 (P < 0.001) in the total population. The improvement was greater in males (C-index increase from 0.684 to 0.771; Δ = +0.087) than in females (from 0.720 to 0.769; Δ = +0.049). The WAP four-disulfide core domain protein (WFDC2) and the growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) were the proteins contributing the strongest C-index increase in both sexes, even more than the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP).

conclusionThe derived sex-specific 10-year MACE risk prediction models, combining 12 protein concentrations among men and 11 protein concentrations among women with the SCORE2 model, significantly improved the discriminative abilities of the SCORE2 model. This study shows the potential of sex-specific proteomic profiles for enhanced cardiovascular risk stratification and personalized prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesProteomicsAdultAgedBiomarkersDiabetes MellitusFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsUnited KingdomBiomarkersCardiovascular riskPrediction modelProteomicsSCORE2Sex-specific

Identifiers

PMID40154735
PMCPMC12766183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.