ArticleBiomaterials2025
Investigation of the biodegradation kinetics and associated mechanical properties of 3D-printed polycaprolactone during long-term preclinical testing.
Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration: from materials design to clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Understanding Polycaprolactone Degradation: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications for Biomedical Device Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Glycine-Functionalized Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofibers as Bioactive Scaffolds for Skin Repair.Polymers · 2026Article
- Design and Synthesis of Peptide-Polyester Conjugates for Cell-Mediated Scaffold Degradation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- PolyGraph - Flexible, Biocompatible & Electrically Optimized Graphene-Polymer Composites for Next-Generation Neural Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Green and Scalable Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds: Solvent-Free Processing, Supercritical COPolymers · 2026Review
- 3D printing as an innovative tool in personalized management of complex airway diseases: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Emerging 4D Fabrication of Tubular Structures and Clinical Challenges: Critical Perspective.ACS materials Au · 2025Review
- Design and Synthesis of Peptide-Polyester Conjugates for Cell-Mediated Scaffold Degradation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biodegradation of Poly(ε-caprolactone): Microorganisms, Enzymes, and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluation Strategies for Tissue-engineered Tracheas: FromIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a bioresorbable polymer increasingly utilized for customized tissue reconstruction as it is readily 3D printed. A critical design requirement for PCL devices is determining the in vivo bioresorption rate and the resulting change in device mechanics suited for target tissue repair applications. The primary challenge with meeting this requirement involves accurate prediction of degradation in the target tissues. PCL undergoes bulk hydrolytic degradation following first order kinetics until an 80-90 % drop in the starting number average molecular weight (Mn) after 2-3 years in vivo. However, initial polymer architecture, composite incorporation, manufacturing modality, device architecture, and target tissue can impact degradation. In vitro models do not fully capture device degradation, and the limited long-term (2-3 year) models primarily utilize subcutaneous implants. In this study, we investigate the degradation rate of 3D-printed airway support devices (ASDs) comprised of PCL and 4 % hydroxyapatite (HA) when implanted on Yucatan porcine tracheas for two years. After one year of degradation, we report a mass loss of less than 1 % and Mn reduction of 25 %. After two years, mass and Mn decreased by 10 % and 50 % respectively. These changes are accompanied by an increase in elastic modulus from 146.7 ± 5.2 MPa for freshly printed ASDs to 291.7 ± 16.0 MPa after one year and 362.5 ± 102.4 MPa after two years. Additionally, there was a decrease in yield strain, and increase in yield stress from implantation to 1-year (p < 0.001). Plastic strain completely diminished by two years, resulting in brittle failure at a yield stress of 12.5 MPa. The significantly lower rate of hydrolysis coupled with hydrolytic embrittlement indicates alternate degradation kinetics compared to subcutaneous models. Fitting a new model for degradation and predicting elastic and damage properties of this new degradation paradigm provide significant advancements for 3D-printed device design in clinical repair applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.