ArticleHealth & place2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and support of women's menstrual experiences: A cross-sectional survey of men in Kampala, Uganda.
Article in Health & place, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menstruation has received growing attention in public health research, particularly among adolescents in schools. However, fewer studies have engaged adult men. This secondary analysis (1) assessed alignment between men's perceptions of women's menstruation practices and women's actual practices; 2) examined associations between men's demographic characteristics and their perception of menstruation-related communication norms, and 3) assessed if men's perceptions of these norms are associated with their support of menstruating women or girls in their household. Cross-sectional data were collected via household survey from men (n = 344) and women (n = 297) in Kampala, Uganda in 2022. Outcomes were two norms questions on the appropriateness of discussing menstruation in public and in front of men. We used a combination of Poisson and Firth's regressions. Presence of a menstruator in the household was positively associated with men's perception that it is acceptable to discuss menstruation in front of men (PR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.76; p < 0.01) or in public (PR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.46; p < 0.01). Supportive norms were associated with supportive behaviors; men who agreed that women may discuss menstruation in public and in front of men were more likely to report a willingness to talk to women about menstruation-related problems (PR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.38, 2.22; p < 0.001). Our findings support the need for norms change to reduce stigma around discussing menstruation. Programs aiming to improve menstrual health should consider men's knowledge of menstruation, their role in the household environment around menstruation, and how norms may contribute to how they support menstruators in their households.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.