ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Methacholine hyperresponsiveness in mice with house dust mite-induced lung inflammation is not associated with excessive airway constriction ex vivo.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung maneuvers of large amplitudes for probing physiological alterations in mouse models of asthma.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- The testosterone paradox in asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Methacholine hyperresponsiveness in mice with house dust mite-induced lung inflammation is not associated with excessive airway constriction ex vivo.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of excessive airway constriction in the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine in mice with experimental asthma is still contentious. Yet, there have been very few studies investigating whether the increased in vivo response to methacholine caused by experimental asthma is associated with a corresponding increase in ex vivo airway constriction. Herein, the responses to nebulized methacholine in vivo and airway constriction in lung slices ex vivo were studied in 8- to 10-week-old male mice of two strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6. Experimental asthma was induced by administering house dust mites (HDM) intranasally, once daily, for 10 consecutive days. Complementary ex vivo studies were conducted with excised tracheas to measure and compare isometric force. As expected, the in vivo response to methacholine, and especially the hyperresponsiveness caused by HDM, was greater in BALB/c than in C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, there were no differences in maximal airway constriction between mouse strains, and the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine caused by HDM in both mouse strains was not associated with a corresponding increase in ex vivo airway constriction. The experiments with excised tracheas demonstrated no differences in isometric force between strains and between mice with and without experimental asthma. It is concluded that the hyperresponsiveness to nebulized methacholine in an acute mouse model of asthma induced by repeated HDM exposures is not associated with excessive airway constriction ex vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.