Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153794›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Lung Cancer Screening in Family Members and Peers of Patients With Lung Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

Isabelle Pitrou, Adriano Petrangelo, Charlotte Besson, Carmela Pepe, Annika Helen Waschke, Jason Agulnik, Anne V Gonzalez, Nicole Ezer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05645731 (Lung Cancer Screening in Family Members and Peers of Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05645731 completednot on this map

Lung Cancer Screening in Family Members and Peers of Lung Cancer Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNicole Ezer, MD, FRCPC, MPHRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung Cancer Screening, Patient Empowerment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabelle PitrouCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-9677
Adriano PetrangeloCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-9079-1260
Charlotte BessonCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5850-459X
Carmela PepeDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-2677-3047
Annika Helen WaschkeCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7846-1363
Jason AgulnikDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-1525-6235
Anne V GonzalezCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-2948
Nicole EzerCentre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-6418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is promising for the early detection of lung cancer (LC) and the reduction of LC-related mortality. Despite the implementation of LC screening programs worldwide, recruitment is challenging. While recruitment for LC screening is based on physician referrals and mass advertising, novel recruitment strategies are needed to improve the enrollment of high-risk individuals into LC screening.

objectiveWe aim to identify whether patients with LC can act as advocates to enroll their family members and close contacts into LC screening and whether this strategy increases screening uptake at the population level.

methodsWe designed a prospective cohort study comprising 2 cohorts constituted between June 2023 and January 2024 with a prospective follow-up of 18 months. Patients with LC (cohort 1) are approached at clinics of the McGill University Health Centre, educated on tools for communicating with family members and close contacts about the benefits of LC screening, and invited to refer their close ones. Referred individuals (cohort 2) are directed to this study's web-based questionnaire to assess their LC risk score with the PLCOm2012 (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial) prediction model. Individuals meeting the eligibility criteria for LC screening (PLCOm2012 score ≥2% and aged 55-74 years) are directed toward the Quebec LC screening program. Data collected include sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy and smoking status (all participants), patient activation (cohort 1), perceived risk of LC, and generalized anxiety at baseline and at 28 days (cohort 2). LDCT completion within 18 months from referral is assessed from health records. Focus groups will identify the barriers and facilitators in the uptake of LC screening and preventative behaviors based on perceived genetic and clinical LC risks. The primary outcomes are the number of referred participants per survivor of LC and the mean risk of LC of the referred population based on PLCOm2012 scores. The secondary outcomes are the proportion of (1) participants eligible for LC screening; (2) participants eligible for screening who complete LDCT screening within 18 months of referral from a survivor of LC; (3) participants showing interest in genetic testing to inform LC risk; and (4) participants showing interest in a smoking cessation program. Multivariable logistic regression will identify the predictive factors of being referred for LC screening. PLCOm2012 scores will be compared for referred participants and controls from the provincial LC screening program.

resultsOverall, 25 survivors of LC and 84 close contacts were enrolled from June 2023 to January 2024, with followed up through July 2025. The results are expected by the end of 2025.

conclusionsWe describe an approach to LC screening referral, leveraging patients with LC as advocates to increase screening awareness and uptake among their family and peers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05645731; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05645731. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/58529.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFamilyLung NeoplasmsMass ScreeningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTomography, X-Ray Computedchest tomographycohort studyearly detection of cancerlow-dose CTlung cancerlung cancer screeningpatient advocacypatient empowermentpatient experiencereferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID40153794
PMCPMC11992492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.