ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Clinicians' Perceptions and Potential Applications of Robotics for Task Automation in Critical Care: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterest in integrating robotics within intensive care units (ICUs) has been propelled by technological advancements, workforce challenges, and heightened clinical demands, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. The integration of robotics in ICUs could potentially enhance patient care and operational efficiency amid existing challenges faced by health care professionals, including high workload and decision-making complexities.
objectiveThis qualitative study aimed to explore ICU clinicians' perceptions of robotic technology and to identify the types of tasks that might benefit from robotic assistance. We focused on the degree of acceptance, perceived challenges, and potential applications for improving patient care in 5 Southeastern US hospitals between January and August 2023.
methodsA qualitative study through semistructured interviews and questionnaires was conducted with 15 ICU clinicians (7 nurses, 6 physicians, and 2 advanced practice providers) from 5 hospitals in the Southeast United States. Directed content analysis was used to categorize and interpret participants' statements, with statistical tests used to examine any role-based differences in how they viewed robotic integration.
resultsAmong the 15 participants, 73% (11/15) were female, with an average of 6.4 (SD 6.3) years of ICU experience. We identified 78 distinct tasks potentially suitable for robotic assistance, of which 50 (64%) involved direct patient care (eg, repositioning patients and assisting with simple procedures), 19 (24%) concerned indirect patient care (eg, delivering supplies and cleaning), 6 (8%) addressed administrative tasks (eg, answering call lights), and 3 (4%) were classified as mixed direct and indirect (eg, sitting with a patient to keep them calm). Most participants supported the automation of routine, noncritical tasks (eg, responding to nurse calls and measuring glucose levels), viewing this strategy as a way to alleviate workload and enhance efficiency. Conversely, high-complexity tasks requiring nuanced clinical judgment (eg, ventilator settings) were deemed unsuitable for full automation. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in how nurses, physicians, and advanced practice providers perceived these tasks (P=.22).
conclusionsOur findings indicate a significant opportunity to use robotic systems to perform noncomplex tasks in ICUs, thereby potentially improving efficiency and reducing staff burden. Clinicians largely view robots as supportive tools rather than substitutes for human expertise. However, concerns persist regarding privacy, patient safety, and the loss of human touch, particularly for tasks requiring high-level clinical decision-making. Future research should involve broader, more diverse clinician samples and investigate the long-term impact of robotic assistance on patient outcomes while also incorporating patient perspectives to ensure ethical, patient-centered adoption of robotic technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.