Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153755›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound and computed tomography for acute appendicitis: A single center retrospective study.

Yiying Zhao, Hanwen Liu, Dechao Guo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiying ZhaoSpecial Inspection Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Hanwen LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dechao GuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2378-3076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) examination for acute appendicitis (AA). A total of 41 patients with suspected AA were enrolled in this study. CT scan was performed in 24 patients, and US was performed in 17 patients. Both CT scan and US were performed in 7 patients. The primary outcomes were the performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) of US and CT in the patients with suspected AA. The secondary outcomes included the diagnostic accuracy of CT and US. By using US, 6 patients (35%) were incorrectly diagnosed and 2 other patients (12%) had equivocal results. By using CT as the primary diagnostic tool, 4 patients (17%) were misdiagnosed and 8 patients (33%) had equivocal results. Even if the equivocal results of CT and US were excluded from the calculation, the sensitivity and specificity of CT was 88% and 71% respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of US was 73% and 50%, respectively. Although CT and US are believed to be reliable diagnostic tool to precisely diagnose AA. The rate of negative appendectomy still remains high. There is a need to develop a more accurate methods to diagnose AA, and therefore rate of negative appendectomy can be reduced.

Indexed as

AppendicitisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40153755
PMCPMC11957627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.