ArticlePloS one2025
Genome-wide association and selection studies for pod dehiscence resistance in the USDA soybean germplasm collection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-Genome Analysis Reveals Evolutionary Dynamics and Functional Divergence of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pod Dehiscence in Soybean: Genome Wide Association Study and Genomic Prediction.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a domestication trait, pod dehiscence has a pleiotropic effect on agronomic traits and significantly contributes to yield loss in soybean. Population studies are still required to comprehend the genetic basis of dehiscence and to develop pod dehiscence-resistant cultivars with the optimal haplotype, thereby improving soybean production. We collected data for one wild (Glycine soja) (G. soja) and four cultivated (Glycine max) (G. max) populations from the USDA database. The G. max populations were evaluated in multi-environment conditions and used for genome-wide association study (GWAS) and selection. GWAS captured 86 quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Seventy-four new QTLs were colocalized in two different G. max populations, and 12 QTLs were closely mapped with previously reported QTLs. Eight out of 86 QTLs were associated with the domestication of pod dehiscence. We implemented marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genomic selection (GS) approaches to select pod dehiscence-resistant accessions with the best haplotype and lowest genomic breeding value (GBV), respectively. While our findings could be utilized for biology, genetics, and plant breeding, selecting pod dehiscence-resistant cultivars with the optimal haplotype will need further studies to confirm additional QTLs and assess advanced GS models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.