Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153701›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Revisiting the Loa loa microfilaremia thresholds above which serious adverse events may occur with ivermectin treatment.

Charlotte Boullé, Sébastien D Pion, Jacques Gardon, Nathalie Gardon-Wendel, Joël Fokom Domgue, Joseph Kamgno, Cédric B Chesnais, Michel Boussinesq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte BoulléUMI 233, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, INSERM Unité, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3800-6315
Sébastien D PionUMI 233, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, INSERM Unité, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jacques GardonHydrosciences Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montpellier, France.
Nathalie Gardon-WendelCentre Pasteur, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Joël Fokom DomgueDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Joseph KamgnoHigher Institute for Scientific and Medical Research, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Cédric B ChesnaisUMI 233, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, INSERM Unité, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Michel BoussinesqUMI 233, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, INSERM Unité, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoiasis was long deemed to be a benign condition, but individuals with high Loa loa microfilarial densities (MFD) are at risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) including encephalopathy following ivermectin (IVM) administration. The risk of marked AE or SAE is usually considered when MFD exceeds 8000 microfilariae (mf)/mL or 30,000 mf/mL, respectively. There are no international guidelines on the treatment of loiasis, resulting in a variety of practices worldwide for the treatment of infected individuals outside endemic areas. Our objective was to determine the probabilities of SAEs after IVM administration at the usual thresholds, and to refine those thresholds using individual characteristics such as age and sex.

methodsWe used data from two clinical trials conducted in Cameroon where L. loa MFD were determined before IVM administration. The risk of SAE was modeled as a logistic function of age, sex, and MFD transformed as a first-order fractional polynomial. PRINCIPAL

findingsSAEs probabilities were found to be <104 for MFD<2000 mf/mL, > 1‰ for MFD >8000 mf/mL, >1% for MFD>20,000 mf/mL, and >2.5% for MFD>30,000 mf/mL. We showed that specific categories may be at a higher risk of SAE than expected. Specifically, in order not to exceed 1% risk, the corresponding thresholds would be 18,000 mf/mL for females in the 31-40 age group; 16,000 mf/mL for males in the 21-30 age group; 12,000 mf/mL for males in the 31-40 age group; and 19,000 mf/mL for males in the 41-50 age group.

conclusionsOur study suggests that IVM should be used with caution for males or individuals in specific age categories with a high L. loa MFD. For these high risk groups, lowering the thresholds to 8000 mf/mL should be considered. The increased risk in males requires further investigation to understand the pathophysiological phenomena involved that are crucial to prevent and manage SAEs.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsFilaricidesIvermectinLoaLoiasisAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsCameroonChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMicrofilariaeAntiparasitic AgentsFilaricidesIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID40153701
PMCPMC11981195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.