ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Revisiting the Loa loa microfilaremia thresholds above which serious adverse events may occur with ivermectin treatment.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laboratory diagnosis of loiasis to support individual patient management: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Preclinical animal models for onchocerciasis and loiasis: A systematic review of applications in drug screening.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of the efficacy and safety of two albendazole regimens for the treatment of hypermicrofilaraemic loiasis in adults in Woleu-Ntem Province, Gabon: A phase IIb single-blind randomised controlled trial.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Trial
- From the Laboratory to the Field: Assessing the Usability of the NTDscope in the Tropical Rainforest Region of Gabon.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLoiasis was long deemed to be a benign condition, but individuals with high Loa loa microfilarial densities (MFD) are at risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) including encephalopathy following ivermectin (IVM) administration. The risk of marked AE or SAE is usually considered when MFD exceeds 8000 microfilariae (mf)/mL or 30,000 mf/mL, respectively. There are no international guidelines on the treatment of loiasis, resulting in a variety of practices worldwide for the treatment of infected individuals outside endemic areas. Our objective was to determine the probabilities of SAEs after IVM administration at the usual thresholds, and to refine those thresholds using individual characteristics such as age and sex.
methodsWe used data from two clinical trials conducted in Cameroon where L. loa MFD were determined before IVM administration. The risk of SAE was modeled as a logistic function of age, sex, and MFD transformed as a first-order fractional polynomial. PRINCIPAL
findingsSAEs probabilities were found to be <104 for MFD<2000 mf/mL, > 1‰ for MFD >8000 mf/mL, >1% for MFD>20,000 mf/mL, and >2.5% for MFD>30,000 mf/mL. We showed that specific categories may be at a higher risk of SAE than expected. Specifically, in order not to exceed 1% risk, the corresponding thresholds would be 18,000 mf/mL for females in the 31-40 age group; 16,000 mf/mL for males in the 21-30 age group; 12,000 mf/mL for males in the 31-40 age group; and 19,000 mf/mL for males in the 41-50 age group.
conclusionsOur study suggests that IVM should be used with caution for males or individuals in specific age categories with a high L. loa MFD. For these high risk groups, lowering the thresholds to 8000 mf/mL should be considered. The increased risk in males requires further investigation to understand the pathophysiological phenomena involved that are crucial to prevent and manage SAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.