ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2025
What Is the Clinical Efficacy of Combined Semitendinosus Autograft Reconstruction and Scar Tissue Repair for Chronic Irreparable Patellar Tendon Rupture?
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CORR Insights®: What Is the Clinical Efficacy of Combined Semitendinosus Autograft Reconstruction and Scar Tissue Repair for Chronic Irreparable Patellar Tendon Rupture?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinting patient-specific grafts for tendon/ligament repair in motion: emerging trends and challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic patellar tendon rupture is a rare but serious injury that can lead to significant functional impairment if not treated effectively. Traditional repair methods often result in rerupture because of tendon defects, adhesions, and poor tissue quality. Although tendon graft reconstruction is the first-line treatment, the role of combining the remaining scar tissue with tendon grafting in improving patient-reported outcomes has not been fully explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What improvements in patient-reported outcomes and radiographic results were observed after reconstruction of chronic patellar tendon ruptures with semitendinosus autograft combined with scar tissue repair? (2) What ROM was achieved after recovery, and were patients free from extensor lag? (3) What surgical complications were associated with this technique?
methodsThis retrospective case-series study included 47 patients with chronic patellar tendon rupture treated from January 2010 to December 2023 diagnosed by clinical assessment, MR imaging, and surgical exploration during the procedure. Among the 47 patients, 23 patients met the following inclusion criteria: (1) radiographic patella alta (Caton-Deschamps Index [CDI] > 1.3 or modified Insall-Salvati Index [ISI] > 2) with MRI confirmation of patellar tendon rupture and (2) treatment with semitendinosus autografts reconstruction and scar tissue repair. Two patients were lost to follow-up before the minimum study follow-up time of 1 year, and for patients with bilateral rupture, we included the more affected side, leaving 21 of 47 patients with 21 knees ultimately included in the final analysis. For each included patient, we collected preoperative baseline and final follow-up data, which included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score, knee ROM, extensor lag, patellar height assessed by CDI and ISI, and any surgical complications. All patients had at least 12 months of follow-up (median [range] 65 months [12 to 161]). Follow-up data were obtained from clinical visits, phone interviews, and medical records.
resultsPatient-reported outcomes demonstrated improvements, with the IKDC score increasing from a mean ± SD 46 ± 6 preoperatively to 92 ± 5 postoperatively (mean difference -46 [95% confidence interval (CI) -49 to -43]; p < 0.01). Radiographic evaluation confirmed normal restoration of patellar height, with the CDI improving from a mean ± SD 1.9 ± 0.3 to 1.1 ± 0.1 and the modified ISI from 2.4 ± 0.3 to 1.5 ± 0.2. Postoperative knee ROM improved from 100° ± 31° to 140° ± 2° (mean difference -40° [95% CI -54° to -25°]; p < 0.01). Extensor lag resolved in 16 of 21 patients (21 of 21 preoperatively versus 5 of 21 postoperatively), with a mean deficit of 1° ± 2°, representing a mean improvement of 33° (95% CI 22° to 43°; p < 0.01). One of 21 patients was rehospitalized because of poor postoperative incision healing. No other major complications occurred.
conclusionIn this study, we demonstrated that reconstruction with semitendinosus autografts combined with scar tissue repair provides significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and functional measures for patients with chronic patellar tendon rupture. The IKDC score, ROM, and extensor lag all showed substantial improvement postoperatively. While our findings were promising, the lack of a comparator group limited our ability to draw definitive conclusions about the role of scar tissue in tendon remodeling. Future studies with a larger sample size and a comparator group could provide more insights into these aspects, including the potential impact of scar tissue on tendon healing through histopathologic evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.