Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153693›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Neural mechanisms for the attention-mediated propagation of conceptual information in the human brain.

David Acunzo, Damiano Grignolio, Clayton Hickey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David AcunzoCentre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Damiano GrignolioCentre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Clayton HickeyCentre for Human Brain Health and School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-5643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual environment is complicated, and humans and other animals accordingly prioritize some sources of information over others through the deployment of spatial attention. Cognitive theories propose that one core purpose of this is to gather information that can be used in downstream cognitive processes, including the development of concepts and categories. However, neuroscientific investigation has focused closely on the identification of the systems and algorithms that support attentional control or that instantiate the effect of attention on sensation and perception. Much less is known about how attention impacts the acquisition and activation of concepts. Here, we use machine learning of EEG and concurrently recorded EEG/MRI to temporally and anatomically characterize the neural network that abstracts from attended perceptual information to activate and construct semantic and conceptual representations. We find that variance in the amplitude of N2pc-an event-related potential (ERP) component closely linked to selective attention-predicts the emergence of conceptual information in a network including prefrontal, posterior parietal, and anterior insular cortex. This network appears to play a key role in the attention-mediated translation of perceptual information to concepts, semantics, and action plans.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainConcept FormationEvoked Potentials, VisualVisual PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40153693
PMCPMC12135929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.