ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Accuracy of Smartphone-Mediated Snore Detection in a Simulated Real-World Setting: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-quality sleep is essential for both physical and mental well-being. Insufficient or poor-quality sleep is linked to numerous health issues, including cardiometabolic diseases, mental health disorders, and increased mortality. Snoring-a prevalent condition-can disrupt sleep and is associated with disease states, including coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Objective: The SleepWatch smartphone app (Bodymatter, Inc) aims to monitor and improve sleep quality and has snore detection capabilities that were built through a machine-learning process trained on over 60,000 acoustic events. This study evaluated the accuracy of the SleepWatch snore detection algorithm in a simulated real-world setting. Methods: The snore detection algorithm was tested by using 36 simulated snoring audio files derived from 18 participants. Each file simulated a snoring index between 30 and 600 snores per hour. Additionally, 9 files with nonsnoring sounds were tested to evaluate the algorithm's capacity to avoid false positives. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each test, and results were compared by using Bland-Altman plots and Spearman correlation to assess the statistical association between detected and actual snores. Results: The SleepWatch algorithm showed an average sensitivity of 86.3% (SD 16.6%), an average specificity of 99.5% (SD 10.8%), and an average accuracy of 95.2% (SD 5.6%) across the snoring tests. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 98.9% (SD 2.6%) and 93.8% (SD 14.4%) respectively. The algorithm performed exceptionally well in avoiding false positives, with a specificity of 97.1% (SD 3.5%) for nonsnoring files. Inclusive of all snoring and nonsnore tests, the aggregated accuracy for all trials in this bench study was 95.6% (SD 5.3%). The Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of -29.8 (SD 41.7) snores per hour, and the Spearman correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (rs=0.974; P<.001) between detected and actual snore rates. Conclusions: The SleepWatch snore detection algorithm demonstrates high accuracy and compares favorably with other snore detection apps. Aside from its broader use in sleep monitoring, SleepWatch demonstrates potential as a tool for identifying individuals at risk for sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea, on the basis of the snoring index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.