Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153546›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Accuracy of Smartphone-Mediated Snore Detection in a Simulated Real-World Setting: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Jeffrey Brown, Zachary Mitchell, Yu Albert Jiang, Ryan Archdeacon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey BrownBodymatter, Inc, 4343 Von Karman Ave, Suite 150J, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, United States, 1 877-870-0649.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-4250
Zachary MitchellBodymatter, Inc, 4343 Von Karman Ave, Suite 150J, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, United States, 1 877-870-0649.ORCID 0009-0007-8220-1672
Yu Albert JiangBodymatter, Inc, 4343 Von Karman Ave, Suite 150J, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, United States, 1 877-870-0649.ORCID 0009-0006-2440-5717
Ryan ArchdeaconBodymatter, Inc, 4343 Von Karman Ave, Suite 150J, Newport Beach, CA, 92660, United States, 1 877-870-0649.ORCID 0009-0003-6287-8978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-quality sleep is essential for both physical and mental well-being. Insufficient or poor-quality sleep is linked to numerous health issues, including cardiometabolic diseases, mental health disorders, and increased mortality. Snoring-a prevalent condition-can disrupt sleep and is associated with disease states, including coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Objective: The SleepWatch smartphone app (Bodymatter, Inc) aims to monitor and improve sleep quality and has snore detection capabilities that were built through a machine-learning process trained on over 60,000 acoustic events. This study evaluated the accuracy of the SleepWatch snore detection algorithm in a simulated real-world setting. Methods: The snore detection algorithm was tested by using 36 simulated snoring audio files derived from 18 participants. Each file simulated a snoring index between 30 and 600 snores per hour. Additionally, 9 files with nonsnoring sounds were tested to evaluate the algorithm's capacity to avoid false positives. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each test, and results were compared by using Bland-Altman plots and Spearman correlation to assess the statistical association between detected and actual snores. Results: The SleepWatch algorithm showed an average sensitivity of 86.3% (SD 16.6%), an average specificity of 99.5% (SD 10.8%), and an average accuracy of 95.2% (SD 5.6%) across the snoring tests. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 98.9% (SD 2.6%) and 93.8% (SD 14.4%) respectively. The algorithm performed exceptionally well in avoiding false positives, with a specificity of 97.1% (SD 3.5%) for nonsnoring files. Inclusive of all snoring and nonsnore tests, the aggregated accuracy for all trials in this bench study was 95.6% (SD 5.3%). The Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of -29.8 (SD 41.7) snores per hour, and the Spearman correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation (rs=0.974; P<.001) between detected and actual snore rates. Conclusions: The SleepWatch snore detection algorithm demonstrates high accuracy and compares favorably with other snore detection apps. Aside from its broader use in sleep monitoring, SleepWatch demonstrates potential as a tool for identifying individuals at risk for sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea, on the basis of the snoring index.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneSnoringAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBodymattermachine learningmobile devicemobile healthneural netsleep apneasleep monitoringsleep trackingSleepWatchsmartphonesmartphone applicationsnore detectionsnore tracking

Identifiers

PMID40153546
PMCPMC11970566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.