Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153385›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gender representation among speakers at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists meetings: A retrospective analysis.

Michiko Kinoshita, Yoko Sakai, Katsuya Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michiko KinoshitaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima-shi, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8680-7654
Yoko SakaiDivision of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima-shi, Tokushima, Japan.
Katsuya TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima-shi, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigates the gender distribution of speakers at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) annual and branch meetings of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.

methodsWe examined the gender of speakers in sessions at both JSA annual and branch meetings. We also verified the speakers' Japanese medical licensure status and years of qualification.

resultsWe analyzed 383 sessions from JSA annual meetings between 2019 and 2024, which included 827 speaker slots. Of them, 679 (82.1%) were men and 148 (17.9%) were women. Women were significantly underrepresented in sessions with fewer speaker slots (chi-square test, p =  0.006; trend test, p <  0.001). Furthermore, sessions were frequently composed entirely of men: 73.1% of all sessions and 44.3% of panel presentations were solely male participants. Among the subspecialties, female representation was high in obstetric anesthesia (36.8%) and pediatric anesthesia (31.8%) but low in cardiovascular anesthesia (6.3%). Among 508 speakers with confirmed Japanese medical licenses, 425 (83.7%) were men, and 83 (16.3%) were women, with no significant differences in gender distribution based on the year of licensure (Fisher's exact test, p =  0.968; trend test, p =  0.463). Additionally, we examined 104 sessions from JSA branch meetings between 2019 and 2023, comprising 176 speaker slots. Of them, 147 (83.5%) were men and 29 (16.5%) were women. There was no significant difference in gender distribution among branch meetings across different regions (p =  0.984).

conclusionThese findings underscore the need for proactive measures to promote gender diversity in Japan's anesthesiology field.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsAnesthesiologyCongresses as TopicSex DistributionSocieties, MedicalFemaleHumansJapanMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40153385
PMCPMC11952204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.