ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2025
Multilaboratory Study of a Nontarget Data Acquisition for Target Analysis (nDATA) Workflow Using Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Screening of 1087 Pesticides in Fresh Fruits and Vegetables.
Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A nontarget Data Acquisition for Target Analysis (nDATA) workflow was developed to screen pesticides in fresh produce based on ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution full scan mass spectrometry/variable data-independent tandem mass spectrometry acquisition (LC-FS MS/vDIA MSMS) and a pesticide database. The MSMS spectral library was generated to create a database consisting of 1087 pesticides based on authentic pesticide standards. The retention time (±0.5 min), precursor ion (≤± 5 ppm), and product ions (≤± 5 ppm) were extracted for each pesticide from LC-FS MS/data-dependent MSMS acquisition (LC-FS MS/DDA MSMS). Mass accuracy criteria, along with ±0.1 min retention time tolerance, were used for the identification of pesticides. Three laboratories evaluated and validated the nDATA workflow to screen and identify pesticides from produce extracts (apples, bananas, broccoli, carrots, grapes, lettuce, oranges, potatoes, strawberry, and tomatoes) prepared by the Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) procedure. Of the 1087 pesticides evaluated, false-positive rates were ≤5% for 977 pesticides in blank matrices and false-negative rates were ≤5% for 921 and 985 pesticides in fortified matrices at 10 and 100 μg/kg, respectively. False positives detected were misidentified pesticides, incurred residues, or contaminants possibly resulting from process or system contamination detected below the threshold level of 10 μg/kg. False negatives were attributed to pesticides that did not sufficiently ionize or fragment or had poor stabilities and QuEChERS extraction efficiencies. Incurred residues in archived produce samples (apple, Chinese broccoli, grape, kale, kohlrabi, orange, pepper, strawberry, tomato, and turnip green) were prepared using QuEChERS, evaluated by the nDATA workflow, and the results were compared and confirmed, if possible, to targeted GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS, and LC-FS MS/DDA MSMS methods. The three laboratories identified 25 parent pesticides at levels >10 μg/kg that were consistent with findings from targeted procedures and discovered 10 different metabolites that were not provided in the multiple reaction monitoring method or inclusion list of the targeted procedures. GC-MS/MS identified two pesticides, chlorothalonil and dacthal, and a possible chlorothalonil metabolite, pentachlorobenzonitrile, that were not amenable to LC-low or LC-high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis in produce samples. To improve the identification quality, the nDATA workflow further implemented quality control, operational, and processing measures to reduce the number of false detects, and the data evaluation workload. As demonstrated in this study, the validated nDATA workflow creates new opportunities for chemical residues analysis, offering a potential screening complement to targeted LC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS, and nontargeted methods for pesticides and other contaminants of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.