ArticlePloS one2025
Attractiveness and retention factors for employed physiotherapists in France: A multicentre survey.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing the attractiveness of employed physiotherapy, considering the shortage of physiotherapists in the salaried sector, previously unsuccessful measures.
methodsA survey was conducted using an online self-administered questionnaire. The primary outcome measure involved assessing respondents' agreement with each statement in key domains. Regarding the secondary outcome measures, the relationships between respondents' age and their responses, as well as the relationship between their profession and their responses, were examined.
resultsThe study included 448 participants in France, encompassing both primary and secondary care settings. The sample consisted of practicing physiotherapists (83.1%) and healthcare managers (16.9%). Respondents expressed significant concerns regarding the attractiveness of employed physiotherapy. For the primary outcome, the study identified potential solutions, including improving financial recognition, promoting continuous professional development, and enhancing inclusion in healthcare projects. For the secondary outcomes, statistically significant relationships were found between respondents' age and their answers for variables 16 (additional qualifications; p = 0.048), 24 (work-life balance; p = 0.010), and 25 (professional quality of life; p = 0.0005).
conclusionThe findings underscore the need to enhance financial recognition, support continuous professional development, and increase inclusion in healthcare projects to effectively improve the attractiveness of employed physiotherapy. These results have significant implications for policymakers and healthcare institutions grappling with recruitment challenges. Further research and collaborative efforts are crucial to implementing the recommended measures and assessing their impact on the employed physiotherapy profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.