Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153274›Full record

ReviewBioanalysis2025

Microsampling techniques and patient-centric therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants.

Arkadiusz Kocur, Tomasz Pawiński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arkadiusz KocurDepartment of Drug Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-8532
Tomasz PawińskiDepartment of Drug Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-4312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy after solid organ transplantation (SOT) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for therapy individualization. The venous whole blood is still considered as routine matrix for monitoring immunosuppressive drug concentration. On the other hand, as an alternative, capillary blood collected using noninvasive sampling is convergent with a patient-centric approach. Despite their disadvantages regarding sample homogeneity and the hematocrit effect, well-known dried blood spot techniques have shown promising results. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) and quantitative dried blood spot (qDBS) have successfully eliminated these unfavorable biased elements. Microsampling can be used in transplant recipients' care, mainly due to long-term therapy under control drug concentrations and the long distance between the place of the patient's residence and the diagnostic laboratory in the transplant center. The study aimed to discuss the clinical consequences of implementing microsampling techniques for TDM of immunosuppressants. Additionally, we have discussed the 'hot topics' in microsampling: home-based self-sampling, adherence to therapy monitoring, and drug concentration conversion to estimated traditional matrices. Finally, based on our experience and current practice, we propose best practices for microsampling implementation from bench to bedside. Microsampling techniques can potentially revolutionise immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy by enabling patient-centric individualisation in various subpopulations, significantly improving post-transplant care.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionDrug MonitoringImmunosuppressive AgentsDried Blood Spot TestingHumansImmunosuppressive Agentsclinical validationDBSImmunosuppressive drugsLC-MS/MSmicrosamplingtransplantationVAMS

Identifiers

PMID40153274
PMCPMC11959920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.