ReviewBioanalysis2025
Microsampling techniques and patient-centric therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants.
Review in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volumetric Microsampling for Patient-Centric Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Clinical Pharmacology: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Applications of Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in Kidney Transplant Management: Are Clinicians Ready for the Next Wave of Patient Care?Kidney360 · 2026Article
- Calcineurin inhibitor monitoring in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: time to move beyond solid organ transplant paradigms.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of a novel capillary blood collection method for decentralized therapeutic drug monitoring using the True Dose kit.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus Using Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling and Quantitative Dried Blood Spot Methods with LC-MS/MS in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Analytical and Clinical Comparative Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Capillary Blood Self-Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Usability Study of the True DoseBioMed research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy after solid organ transplantation (SOT) requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for therapy individualization. The venous whole blood is still considered as routine matrix for monitoring immunosuppressive drug concentration. On the other hand, as an alternative, capillary blood collected using noninvasive sampling is convergent with a patient-centric approach. Despite their disadvantages regarding sample homogeneity and the hematocrit effect, well-known dried blood spot techniques have shown promising results. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) and quantitative dried blood spot (qDBS) have successfully eliminated these unfavorable biased elements. Microsampling can be used in transplant recipients' care, mainly due to long-term therapy under control drug concentrations and the long distance between the place of the patient's residence and the diagnostic laboratory in the transplant center. The study aimed to discuss the clinical consequences of implementing microsampling techniques for TDM of immunosuppressants. Additionally, we have discussed the 'hot topics' in microsampling: home-based self-sampling, adherence to therapy monitoring, and drug concentration conversion to estimated traditional matrices. Finally, based on our experience and current practice, we propose best practices for microsampling implementation from bench to bedside. Microsampling techniques can potentially revolutionise immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy by enabling patient-centric individualisation in various subpopulations, significantly improving post-transplant care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.