ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2025
Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Projecting the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogs in Italy Using the Prime T2D Model.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Once-weekly administration of insulin in the real-world management of type 2 diabetes. A Delphi-like consensus.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiabetes management often involves complex insulin regimens, posing significant challenges for patients and healthcare systems. Weekly basal insulin formulations aim to simplify treatment, reduce injection frequency, and improve adherence and quality of life. This study explored the beliefs, preferences and attitudes of patients, physicians and payers regarding current basal insulin therapy and weekly insulin formulations.
methodsAn online survey with structured questionnaires was developed for multiple stakeholders: patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, physicians and payers. Participants provided self-reported insights into basal insulin therapy and perceptions of weekly formulations. Results are presented in a descriptive non-analytical way.
resultsA total of 1094 patients, 468 physicians and 100 payers participated. Patients reported moderate satisfaction with current insulin therapy, with lower satisfaction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). The major burdens identified were daily injections and fear of hypoglycaemia, with weekly insulin seen as a promising alternative. Physicians prioritized glycaemic control goals, while patients emphasized independence and quality of life. Payers valued adherence and hypoglycaemia avoidance but raised concerns about costs and education needs.
conclusionsAccording to this multi-stakeholder survey, weekly basal insulin offers a promising approach to reduce treatment burden and improve adherence and quality of life. Addressing concerns about safety, efficacy and cost will be critical to its successful adoption in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.