ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
Sex-related differences in the efficacy and toxicity of cancer treatments.
Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sex-based prognosis in industry-sponsored advanced solid tumor trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis of survival and adverse events.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Early and late CTCAE and patient-reported outcomes following lung cancer radiotherapy: A sex-stratified descriptive analysis from the REQUITE cohort.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with comorbidities.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Symptom Burden, Depressive Symptoms, Resilient Coping, and Pretreatment Health-Related Quality of Life with Breast, Gynecological and Genitourinary Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Observational
- Sex and gender reporting in Australian cancer clinical trials: are we doing enough?Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Sex differences in non-reproductive cancers: mechanistic roles of sex-hormone signaling.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy using sex and gender as precision biomarkers.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Intersecting Roles of Estrogens and Neutrophils in Modulating Innate Immunity in Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Cytokine Toxicity and Bacterial Dysbiosis in Chemotherapy- and/or Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of CYP and ABCB1 Polymorphisms on Bortezomib-Induced Adverse Events in Multiple Myeloma.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Cancer Immunotherapy-Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms With a Focus on NSCLC.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Lack of precision in the reporting of sex and gender in cancer clinical trials with a PRO endpoint: an exploratory literature review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Review
- A Population-Based Study of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Among Adults with Ocular Cancer in the United States, 2000-2021.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences between the biological sexes have long been observed in cancer incidence and prevalence, and in treatment outcomes including efficacy and toxicity. Ideally, there should be sufficient information to improve the individualization of cancer treatment by incorporating sex into treatment decisions. Necessary information should include: the nature and source of these differences; whether inherent to the specific cancer (such as molecular profiles, metabolic behaviors, and immune responses); the pathophysiological mechanisms of the specific cancer; or the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of different cancer drugs. The influence of gender, which is defined as the sociocultural construct that determines societal norms for males and females, should also be included in personalized decision-making. This review aimed to describe the current evidence on the impact of sex and gender on treatment effects, outcomes, and toxicity profiles in cancer patients. Data for the influence of gender were negligible, whereas clinical studies and meta-analyses in different cancer types have identified differences between males and females in the effectiveness on survival outcomes of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy. Similarly, toxicity profiles of different cancer treatments varied between sexes. Based on these observed differences, it seems clear that sex should be included as an important variable when individualizing treatment; however, more research into sex- and gender-related differences in cancer treatment efficacy and toxicity, and the causes for these differences, is required before this can be fully incorporated into individualized treatment programs in real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.