Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153193›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Temporal context modulates the recovery of the attentional blink.

Fangshu Yao, Bin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Attentional modulation of sensory gating during a visuomotor task.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fangshu YaoSchool of Psychology, Key Laboratory of Motor Cognitive Assessment and Regulation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Bin ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. zhoub@psych.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-3317

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071053National Natural Science Foundation of China 32200859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans usually adjust their attentional mode to tackle the challenges posed by environmental inputs. Depending on the uncertainty level, different attentional strategies may be adopted. As people face increasingly complicated daily situations-e.g., driving a car or chatting online-where intervals between significant events do not necessarily follow certain rules but are likely random, it appears important to understand how temporal contexts with different uncertainty levels affect temporal attention allocation when processing rapid serial inputs. We pursued this issue by employing a task examining the temporal limit of attention-the attentional blink (AB). The manipulation of temporal context was achieved by presenting trials with different inter-target intervals following either a "random-walk" or a "random" sequence. The results suggest a facilitated recovery from the AB deficit in the "random" compared to "random-walk" context, without a corresponding change in AB magnitude. Such effect is likely attributed to the higher perceived uncertainty in the former, and could be attenuated by a decrease in the temporal uncertainty level. These observations suggest that observers likely adopted a more flexible temporal attention allocation in the more unpredictable "random" context; they also support non-overlapping mechanisms responsible for AB width/duration and amplitude or lag-1 sparing. The flexibility of temporal attentional control may provide an evolutionary advantage for organisms to deal with unpredictable changes and is likely to be exploited for reference in the design of human-machine interacting platforms.

Indexed as

Attentional BlinkPsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsUncertaintyYoung AdultAttentional blinkAttentional controlInterval timingRandom-walkTemporal context

Identifiers

PMID40153193
PMCPMC11953508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.