ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures: version 2.0.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Are preoperative psychological factors associated with chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessing measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-A in patients with chronic depression in England.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Trial
- Health-related quality of life in racial and ethnic minority adults with type 2 diabetes: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Patient-Reported Outcome scale for Bronchiectasis (BE-PRO): development and validation in China.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Reliability and validity of a short version of the Norwegian Awareness of Social Inference Test: a test of social cognition after traumatic brain injury.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Greek Translation and Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability of the AQUA CHILD Questionnaire in Children With Developmental Disabilities.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- The Brazilian Version of the Visual CARE 5Q: Instrument Translation and Cultural Adaptation.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- The Development of the European Sleep Questionnaire A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Responsiveness, Smallest Detectable Change, and Minimal Important Change of the Turkish Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 Following Pelvic Floor Muscle Training.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Turkish Adaptation, Psychometric Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Reasons for Implicit Rationing of the Nursing Care Scale.International journal of nursing practice · 2026Article
- Convergent validity of the position-reposition and thoracolumbar dissociation tests in patients with recurrent low back pain in remission.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2026Article
- Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Dutch Adult Strabismus-20 Questionnaire (Dutch-AS-20).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire-Patient Version: A Methodological Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Portuguese Version of the MISSCARE Survey-Patient: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale, Korean Version: A Methodological and Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Polish Version of the Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Patient-Centered Scale to Evaluate Decision Aid Usability and Information Overload.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Article
- Methodological Cautions Regarding OFI-8 Validation in Healthy Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn 2021 a set of consensus-based and empirically informed reporting recommendations were developed for primary studies of the measurement properties of patient‑reported outcome measures (PROMs). With their use, we determined that certain reporting items were redundant, some required revisions, and additional items were needed. The aim of this study was to update the COSMIN reporting guideline and develop version 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of PROMs.
methodsThere were seven phases to this update: 1. Identification of relevant experts for the meeting; 2. Solicitation of written feedback on the existing reporting recommendations checklist; 3. Development of the Explanation & Elaboration document; 4. A face-to-face consensus meeting; 5. Post-meeting revisions of the checklist and Explanation & Elaboration document; 6. Circulation of the resultant manuscripts to experts for solicitation of final feedback, and 7. Completion of the final documents and resultant manuscripts, distribution to all members for approval, and finalization.
resultsOverall, the revised recommendations for version 2.0 consists of 31 general items and 37 specific items. Of the general items, 15 were revised or reordered and one item was added. Of the specific items, 15 were revised or reordered and two new items were added.
conclusionWe recommend that the earlier version of this guidance (version 1.0) no longer be used. These revised reporting recommendations (version 2.0) will help to guide those reporting or reading these investigations on the essential information that is recommended to be included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40153128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.