ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025
PCRFed: personalized federated learning with contrastive representation for non-independently and identically distributed medical image segmentation.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) has shown great potential in addressing data privacy issues in medical image analysis. However, varying data distributions across different sites can create challenges in aggregating client models and achieving good global model performance. In this study, we propose a novel personalized contrastive representation FL framework, named PCRFed, which leverages contrastive representation learning to address the non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) challenge and dynamically adjusts the distance between local clients and the global model to improve each client's performance without incurring additional communication costs. The proposed weighted model-contrastive loss provides additional regularization for local models, optimizing their respective distributions while effectively utilizing information from all clients to mitigate performance challenges caused by insufficient local data. The PCRFed approach was evaluated on two non-IID medical image segmentation datasets, and the results show that it outperforms several state-of-the-art FL frameworks, achieving higher single-client performance while ensuring privacy preservation and minimal communication costs. Our PCRFed framework can be adapted to various encoder-decoder segmentation network architectures and holds significant potential for advancing the use of FL in real-world medical applications. Based on a multi-center dataset, our framework demonstrates superior overall performance and higher single-client performance, achieving a 2.63% increase in the average Dice score for prostate segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.