Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40153095›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Structural response of mandibular first molars in the presence of proximal contacts: finite element analysis with antagonist teeth and alternative loading applications.

Saúl Dorado, Jesús R Jimenez-Octavio, Paula Riaza, Ove A Peters, Ana Arias

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saúl DoradoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-6872
Jesús R Jimenez-OctavioMOBIOS Lab, Institute for Research in Technology, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6869-8332
Paula RiazaDepartment of Conservative and Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Complutense University, Plaza Ramon y Cajal s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Ove A PetersOral Health Centre, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5222-8718
Ana AriasDepartment of Conservative and Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Complutense University, Plaza Ramon y Cajal s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, 28040, Spain. aariaspa@ucm.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-8096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the mechanical responses of a mandibular molar under functional loads using antagonist teeth and different loading applications and configurations.

methodsA cone-beam computed tomography of a human mandible and maxilla was used to build 16 different three-dimensional models, including four mandibular configurations [single-tooth model (first mandibular molar-M), and inclusion of mesial (mM), distal (Md) or both proximal contacts (mMd)] and occlusal load applications either with antagonist teeth or alternative Finite Element (FE) models [point load (PL), distributed surface load (SL) and rigid metal sphere (MS)]. FE analysis was performed. Equivalent von Mises (VM) stress was calculated along the entire dentin and periodontal ligament of the first mandibular molar. Maximum VM stresses were compared among the different mandibular configurations and loading applications.

resultsThe highest and lowest VM stress at 50 and 100 N corresponded respectively to the single-tooth SL model (5.78 and 11.5 MPa) and to occlusal load application with antagonist teeth and proximal contacts (2.08 and 3.58 MPa). Maximum VM stresses were consistently located at the cervical area of the mesial root and decreased when adjacent teeth were present.

conclusionsHighest stresses are located in the cervical area of the mesial root of mandibular molars, but the biomechanical behavior depends on the presence of proximal contacts and the loading methodologies used. Single-tooth models represent the worst structural scenario. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Incorporating antagonist teeth and proximal contacts into FE models enhances the biofidelity of dental biomechanics simulations, enabling more accurate extrapolation to clinical conditions.

Indexed as

Bite ForceDental Stress AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisMolarBiomechanical PhenomenaCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMandibleStress, MechanicalBiomechanicsDental tissueFinite element analysisFunctional loadStress distribution

Identifiers

PMID40153095
PMCPMC12602631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.