ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Temporal dynamics of full-body ownership and vicarious touch sensations as inferred from embodying a virtual avatar.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surrogate bias: Behavioral and physiological effects of seeing ingroup and outgroup virtual agents touching one's embodied avatar.Computers in human behavior reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feeling a tactile sensation when observing a touch on an artificial body (Vicarious Touch, VT) and the illusion of full-body ownership (Full-body Ownership Illusion, FBOI) can be effectively induced using Virtual Reality (VR). However, the onset timing of these phenomena, particularly under visual-only stimulation, remains elusive. While prior research has focused on body-part ownership under visuotactile conditions, the temporal dynamics of VT in a full-body context remain underexplored. This study investigated FBOI and VT in 34 healthy participants observing a virtual body from either a first-person (1PP) or third-person (3PP) perspective. Illusory experiences were categorized into different outcomes, and participants provided subjective ratings of onset timing and intensity. These were analyzed alongside physiological measures (respiratory rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance) and psychological traits (empathy and attachment) to explore factors modulating these experiences. Results showed that 1PP significantly accelerated and intensified both FBOI and VT, highlighting the pivotal role of perspective in sensory integration. Conversely, 3PP was linked to a higher prevalence of No Illusion outcomes and weaker illusions, reflecting difficulties in aligning sensory cues. Respiratory rate emerged as a marker of VT experiences, while empathy predicted faster and more intense VT, indicating greater sensitivity in emotionally attuned individuals. These findings provide insights into the temporal dynamics of VT and FBOI, with implications for VR-based therapeutic applications targeting sensory integration and body representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40153052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.