SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
Raman spectroscopy in the detection and diagnosis of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-free molecular profiling of cancer using Raman spectroscopy: from fundamentals to clinical applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Distinct Spectral Profiles of Pleural Effusions from Malignant Tumors Using Raman Spectroscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the world's biggest cause of death related to cancer, and its dismal prognosis has been greatly exacerbated by late-stage diagnosis. Even with improvements in treatment strategies, current diagnostic techniques are frequently imprecise, especially when it comes to early-stage detection. A prospective substitute is Raman spectroscopy, which provides a non-invasive, real-time, and extremely sensitive study of biological samples. The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the identification and diagnosis of lung cancer across a range of sample types. Nine studies that focused on Raman spectroscopy as a stand-alone diagnostic tool and met strict inclusion criteria were found through a systematic review of the literature published between 2014 and 2024. Statistical methods were used to extract, pool, and show diagnostic measures. The remarkable diagnostic accuracy of Raman spectroscopy was highlighted by its pooled sensitivity and specificity which were 98.68% and 91.81%, respectively. Serum-based research showed the strongest findings, with multivariate models such as PCA-LDA supporting specificity and sensitivity values that, in several cases, reached 100%. Diagnostic accuracy was greatly improved by models such as SVM and CNN, particularly when it came to detecting minute spectral alterations associated with cancer. Raman spectroscopy shows great promise as a lung cancer diagnostic method. However, issues including spectral data standardization, sample preparation heterogeneity and the requirement for bigger, multicentre research needs to be addressed. These results will open the door for the incorporation of Raman spectroscopy into standard clinical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.