ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of PET-based prognostic metrics in CAR-T treatment of DLBCL.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Risk Stratification in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review of Classification Models and Predictive Performances.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- A deep learning-based prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating PET/CT imaging features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the development and validation of automated machine learning (AutoML) models for
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 175 elderly (≥ 60 years) DLBCL patients diagnosed between March 2015 and March 2023 at two medical centers, with a total of 1010 lesions. The baseline PET imaging-based radiomics features of the training cohort were processed using AutoML model AutoGluon to generate a radiomics score (radscore) and predict treatment response at the lesion and patient levels. Furthermore, a multivariable logistic analysis was used to design and evaluate a multivariable model in the training and validation cohorts.
resultsROC curve analysis showed that the radscore generated by AutoML exhibited higher accuracy in predicting treatment response at the lesion level compared to metabolic parameters (SUVmax, MTV, and TLG) in both the training group (AUC: 0.791, 0.542, 0.667, 0.651, respectively) and the validation group (AUC: 0.712, 0.616, 0.639, 0.657, respectively). Multivariable logistic analysis indicated that NCCN-IPI (OR = 5.427, 95% CI: 1.163-25.317), BCL-2 (OR = 3.714, 95% CI: 1.406-9.816), TMTV (OR = 4.324, 95% CI: 1.095-17.067), and avg-radscore (OR = 3.176, 95% CI: 1.313-7. 686) were independent predictors of treatment response. The multivariable model comprising NCCN-IPI, BCL-2, TMTV, and avg-radscore outperformed conventional models and clinical-pathological models in predicting treatment response. (P<0.05).
conclusionThe radscore generated by AutoML can predict the treatment response of elderly DLBCL patients, potentially aiding in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.