ReviewRespiratory care2025
Postextubation Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Children.
Review in Respiratory care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postextubation Arterial Blood Gas to Predict Reintubation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.Respiratory care · 2026Article
- Association Between Dead Space to Tidal Volume Ratio and Duration of Respiratory Support After Extubation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.Respiratory care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infants and children frequently require mechanical ventilation. Daily extubation readiness testing is currently recommended to minimize time on mechanical ventilation, which is associated with the development of morbidities. Re-intubation rates vary between patient populations and have been associated with significant adverse patient outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) is often used to help decrease the risk of re-intubation. NRS encompasses high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), CPAP, noninvasive ventilation, and negative-pressure ventilation. This article will cover risk factors for re-intubation, assessing extubation readiness, rationale for NRS use, delivery systems for NRS, evidence for various NRS modalities, how to choose NRS modalities, practical considerations, and future research opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.