Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Led Web Portal on Back Pain: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The economic impact of a physician-introduced web portal on lower back pain: results from a cluster-randomized trial.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Development and proof-of-concept of a complex intervention to support appropriate imaging for musculoskeletal pain: the Betti programme.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is important for patients with back pain to be well-informed. The well-informed patient is better prepared for selfmanagement and for joint decision-making with the physician. This is why we developed tala-med, a web portal providing up-to-date, evidence-based, independent information on back pain. Primary care physicians can use it in their practices and make it accessible to their patients.
methodsA cluster randomized controlled trial (registration number DRKS00014279) was carried out in which the primary care physicians (PCPs) in the intervention group (IG: 33 physicians) were directed to use the tala-med web portal in their consultations with patients who had back pain (180 patients). The PCPs in the control group (CG: 12 physicians) were not given access to talamed and treated their patients with back pain (136 patients) as they had done before. The patients' informedness about back pain was the primary endpoint: it was assessed by the patients themselves in terms of their subjective degree of knowledge and subjective state of informedness about back pain. Pain intensity, the second endpoint, was assessed with a visual analog scale.
resultsIntention-to-treat analyses revealed that the patients' subjective degree of knowledge about back pain increased to a greater extent in the intervention group than in the control group (B = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [0.07; 0.43]), as did their subjective state of informedness about back pain (B = 0.51 [0.13; 0.89]). Patients in the intervention group also reported a larger reduction of pain intensity compared to patients in the control group (B = -10.46 [-18.52; -2.38]).
conclusionUse of the tala-med web portal by primary care physicians and their patients made patients better informed about back pain and lessened the intensity of their pain. These improvements, although statistically significant, were not large enough to be clinically important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.