Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40152754›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2025

Learning together: a narrative review of external resources for medical education through a shared student-faculty lens.

Wenxin Yang, Kelly M Quesnelle, Kirsten A Porter-Stransky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenxin YangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-9141-367X
Kelly M QuesnelleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2408-1904
Kirsten A Porter-StranskyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-8641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External resources, defined as commercial learning resources typically found online and not created by academic institutions, are increasingly utilized by students in medical education. As the use of external resources continues to grow, there is a need to understand their appropriate place within medical education and for faculty members to continue to integrate such resources into the existing medical curricula. A gap in the literature exists regarding the role of such resources within formal medical education. This narrative review identifies factors contributing to the use of external resources, integrates student and faculty perspectives to highlight their unique insights, and collaboratively proposes recommendations for the future use of external resources in medical education. Identified factors contributing to the increased use of external resources include generational affinity for technology and online learning, perceived efficiency compared to live lectures, pass-fail grading system of biomedical science courses, the pressure of board exams, and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although external resources are expensive, medical students use them to support their pre-clerkship learning and performance on national licensure exams. Faculty share the goal of student success and see potential for integration of external resources in the curriculum but raise concerns about reduced learner presence and willingness to read as well as the possibility of a universal medical curriculum. Collaborative student-faculty recommendations include the primacy of student autonomy, the benefits of classroom engagement, and the importance of cost management around third-party resources. Although external resources should not supplant all faculty instruction, they can benefit both medical students and faculty when thoughtfully and strategically integrated within the pre-clerkship curriculum to enhance learning outcomes and board exam performance.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalStudents, MedicalCOVID-19CurriculumHumansLearningSARS-CoV-2COVID-19External resourcesmedical educationonline learningthird-party resources

Identifiers

PMID40152754
PMCPMC11956101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.