ArticleEpilepsia2025
In vitro models of valproic acid to assess neurodevelopmental toxicity: A scoping review.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vocal and social impairments in songbirds embryonically exposed to an autism risk factor.iScience · 2026Article
- Valproic Acid Promotes the Differentiation of Satellite Glial Cells into Neurons via the pH-Dependent Pathway.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- In vitro models of valproic acid to assess neurodevelopmental toxicity: A scoping review.Epilepsia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Valproic acid (VPA) is a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) that is highly efficacious for treating generalized and focal epilepsy disorders. Unfortunately, due to its strong association with teratogenic effects culminating in fetal valproate spectrum disorder (FVSD), which may include neurocognitive and neurobehavioral deficits, the drug has become highly regulated/restricted for women of childbearing potential. This includes those who have been shown to respond well to the drug and respond poorly to alternative ASMs. Concurrently, VPA's neurotoxic, teratogenic mechanisms have been studied in vitro, and continued research may aid in providing depth to our understanding so that superior evidence-based care plans and novel drug designs can be made for patients with epilepsy disorders. This scoping review systematically assesses what in vitro studies have discovered regarding VPA's effects on neural cells and the proposed cellular neurotoxic mechanisms. Neurotoxicity studies have captured the cytotoxic, dysmorphological, genetic, and epigenetic effects in murine and human primary, immortalized, and stem cells in vitro. This includes extensive identification of many genes and gene pathways associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, a hallmark of FVSD. Although published studies have illuminated much about VPA's neurotoxic, teratogenic effects, a lack of standardization in testing methodologies renders making direct comparisons between the results of different studies challenging. Nevertheless, the recent use of human stem cell-based models provides a richer understanding of what cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic effects are caused by VPA exposure. Future in vitro studies may improve their clinical translatability by administering clinically relevant concentrations of VPA to human stem cell-derived neural cells and fostering a better understanding of VPA's neural cell type-specific and epigenetic effects. In vitro VPA neurotoxicity studies on neurodevelopment show a clear potential to provide data that may help construct superior personalized evidence-based treatment plans and novel drug designs for women of childbearing potential with epilepsy disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.