ReviewCell transplantation
The Glial Scar: To Penetrate or Not for Motor Pathway Restoration?
Review in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- M2 polarization of macrophages: Manipulation of spinal cord injury repair.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Acceleration of axonal regeneration by GABA/Gly excitation.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- Functional and Morphological Outcomes of Duration-Dependent Electrical Stimulation in Silicone Conduit-Mediated Peripheral Nerve Repair in Rats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multifunctional nanoplatforms for optic nerve regeneration integrating anti-inflammatory, epigenetic, and ionic mechanisms with emerging artificial intelligence technologies.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although notable progress has been made, restoring motor function from the brain to the muscles continues to be a substantial clinical challenge in motor neuron diseases/disorders such as spinal cord injury (SCI). While cell transplantation has been widely explored as a potential therapeutic method for reconstructing functional motor pathways, there remains considerable opportunity for enhancing its therapeutic effectiveness. We reviewed studies on motor pathway regeneration to identify molecular and ultrastructural cues that could enhance the efficacy of cell transplantation. While the glial scar is often cited as an intractable barrier to axon regeneration, this mainly applies to axons trying to penetrate its "core" to reach the opposite side. However, the glial scar exhibits a "duality," with an anti-regenerative core and a pro-regenerative "surface." This surface permissiveness is attributed to pro-regenerative molecules, such as laminin in the basement membrane (BM). Transplanting donor cells onto the BM, which forms plastically after injury, may significantly enhance the efficacy of cell transplantation. Specifically, forming detour pathways between transplanted cells and endogenous propriospinal neurons on the pro-regenerative BM may efficiently bypass the intractable scar core and promote motor pathway regeneration. We believe harnessing the tissue's innate repair capacity is crucial, and targeting post-injury plasticity in astrocytes and Schwann cells, especially those associated with the BM that has predominantly been overlooked in the field of SCI research, can advance motor system restoration to a new stage. A shift in cell delivery routes-from the traditional intra-parenchymal (InP) route to the transplantation of donor cells onto the pro-regenerative BM via the extra-parenchymal (ExP) route-may signify a transformative step forward in neuro-regeneration research. Practically, however, the complementary use of both InP and ExP methods may offer the most substantial benefit for restoring motor pathways. We aim for this review to deepen the understanding of cell transplantation and provide a framework for evaluating the efficacy of this therapeutic modality in comparison to others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.