Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40152326›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2025

Cochlear Duct Length: Rethinking Its Role in Auditory Outcomes.

Priyank Agrawal, Vishudh Mohan, Vidhu Sharma, Darwin Kaushal, Sarbesh Tiwari, Kapil Soni, Pushpinder S Khera, Amit Goyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priyank AgrawalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0009-0005-2227-009X
Vishudh MohanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-0812
Vidhu SharmaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-2329
Darwin KaushalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bilaspur, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7719-6409
Sarbesh TiwariAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-9070
Kapil SoniAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-6213
Pushpinder S KheraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9714-5462
Amit GoyalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Jodhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-7541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relation between cochlear duct length (CDL) and audiological outcome after cochlear implant surgery in prelingually deafened children. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 36 prelingually deaf children underwent cochlear implantation at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and high-resolution T2 weighted sequences magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of temporal bones were used to calculate CDL. Patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively with visits every three months for audiological scoring (infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale and revised central auditory processing scores). Results: Thirty-six candidates were included in the study. The mean CDL, as measured on temporal bone HRCT, was 32.72±1.278 mm, and, with MRI, was 33.4689±1.31. This study is suggestive of widely dispersed data (coefficient of variance <0.5), and hence, the hypothesis of "implantation in CDL close to 31.5 mm will give the best improvement in functional outcome scores" cannot be generalized. The improvement in functional outcome scores is likely attributable to other causes/multifactorial causation. Conclusion: We found no relationship between CDL and audiological outcomes post-cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children. Further research with larger sample sizes, prospective multicenter designs and extended follow-up periods is warranted to strengthen evidence in this area.

Indexed as

audiologycochlear ductcochlear implantationHearing losspatient outcome assessmentpediatric otorhinolaryngologyradiology

Identifiers

PMID40152326
PMCPMC11977026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.