Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Benjamin D PetersonSchool of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin─Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5290-9142
Sarah E JanssenUpper Midwest Water Science Center, Mercury Research Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin 53726, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4432-3154
Brett A PoulinDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California─Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-7733
Jacob M OgorekUpper Midwest Water Science Center, Mercury Research Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin 53726, United States.
Amber M WhiteEnvironmental Chemistry and Technology Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Elizabeth A McDanielDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Robert A MarickDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Grace J ArmstrongEnvironmental Chemistry and Technology Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8132-9011
Nicholas D ScheelFreshwater and Marine Sciences, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Michael T TateUpper Midwest Water Science Center, Mercury Research Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin 53726, United States.
David P KrabbenhoftUpper Midwest Water Science Center, Mercury Research Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wisconsin 53726, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1964-5020
Katherine D McMahonEnvironmental Chemistry and Technology Program, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Mercury (Hg) contamination of aquatic food webs is controlled in part by the formation and accumulation of toxic and bioaccumulative methylmercury (MeHg). MeHg production is mediated by metabolically diverse microorganisms carrying the
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Sulfate Reduction Drives Elevated Methylmercury Formation in the Water Column of a Eutrophic Freshwater Lake. · full record | OpenQuestion