ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
In Silico High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method Development via Machine Learning.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern Optimization Strategies in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis.Journal of separation science · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) remains the gold standard for analyzing and purifying molecular components in solutions. However, developing HPLC methods is material- and time-consuming, so computer-aided shortcuts are highly desirable. In line with the digitalization of process development and the growth of HPLC databases, we propose a data-driven methodology to predict molecule retention factors as a function of mobile phase composition without the need for any new experiments, solely relying on molecular descriptors (MDs) obtained via simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) string representations of molecules. This new approach combines: (a) quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) using MDs to predict solute-dependent parameters in (b) linear solvation energy relationships (LSER) and (c) linear solvent strength (LSS) theory. We demonstrate the potential of this computational methodology using experimental data for retention factors of small molecules made available by the research community for which the MDs were obtained via SMILES string representations determined by the structural formulas of the molecules. This method can be adopted directly to predict elution times of molecular components; however, in combination with first-principle-based mechanistic transport models, the method can also be employed to optimize HPLC methods in-silico. Both options can reduce the experimental load and accelerate HPLC method development significantly, lowering the time and cost of the drug manufacturing cycle and reducing the time to market. Given the growing number and quality of HPLC databases, the predictive power of this methodology will only increase in the coming years.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.