ArticleThe New phytologist2025
High-throughput assessment of anemophilous pollen size and variability using imaging cytometry.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Method comparison of microscopy, metabarcoding, and multispectral imaging flow cytometry for identification and relative abundance analysis of insect-dispersed pollen.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analyzing Pollen with Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry (MIFC).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning classification of cedar and cypress pollen on routine Durham slides for environmental exposure assessment.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Toward Accurate Real-Time Bioaerosol Monitoring in the Particle Size Range 1 μm-70 μm.ACS ES&T air · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pollen grain size relates to plant community structure via pollen dispersal, plant resource allocation into regenerative processes, plant phylogeny and plant genetics (ploidy), or it can be used as a decisive trait for pollen species distinction. However, the availability of pollen size data is limited because of labor- and time-consuming methodological constraints and is classically based on fewer than 50 measured pollen grains per species, thus restricting our knowledge of the temporal and spatial variability of pollen size in response to biotic and abiotic conditions. We addressed this data gap by using imaging flow cytometry (IFC), which allows for high-throughput assessment of pollen size and measured > 500 000 single pollen from 100 anemophilous species that were sampled between 2018 and 2022. We present a workflow for high-throughput data analysis, show the agreement of IFC estimates with literature size estimates and assess pollen size variability in the context of plant phylogeny. Our approach allows us to make statistically robust measurements of pollen size that are not limited by sampling effort and sample throughput to answer broad ecological questions at large temporal and spatial scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.