ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Functional but Not Structural Brain Changes After Olfactory Training in Women With COVID-19-Associated Olfactory Dysfunction.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends and hotspot evolution of olfactory dysfunction from 2014 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- RETRACTION: Functional but Not Structural Brain Changes After Olfactory Training in Women With COVID-19-Associated Olfactory Dysfunction.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Mapping the Olfactory Brain: A Systematic Review of Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes Following COVID-19 Smell Loss.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Brain-Inspired Multisensory Learning: A Systematic Review of Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Outcomes in Adult Multicultural and Second Language Acquisition.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-07-12Error in Analyses ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlfactory training (OT) is a recommended treatment for olfactory loss and has proven effective in clinical contexts, yet its effects on the central-nervous system remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the functional and structural brain changes in patients with post-viral olfactory loss undergoing OT.
methodsTwenty patients with post-viral olfactory loss and 19 healthy controls underwent OT for 3 months. All participants were assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Voxel-based morphometry and olfactory bulb volumetry were performed on structural images. Presenting an unpleasant odor, n-butanol, in a canonical block design, functional MRI was performed using whole-brain and region of interest analyses.
resultsPatients with post-viral olfactory loss showed significant improvement following OT. Enhanced functional activations were observed in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampus, while OT had little or no effects on brain structures.
conclusionThe present findings suggest that OT provides early perceptual and functional benefits, with structural changes potentially emerging later with extended training duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.