ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation for Liver Yttrium-90 Selective Internal Radiation Therapy.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to evaluate a deep learning-based auto-segmentation method for liver delineation in Y-90 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). A deep learning (DL)-based liver segmentation model using the U-Net3D architecture was built. Auto-segmentation of the liver was tested in CT images of SIRT patients. DL auto-segmented liver contours were evaluated against physician manually-delineated contours. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) were calculated. The DL-model-generated contours were compared with the contours generated using an Atlas-based method. Ratio of volume (RV, the ratio of DL-model auto-segmented liver volume to manually-delineated liver volume), and ratio of activity (RA, the ratio of Y-90 activity calculated using a DL-model auto-segmented liver volume to Y-90 activity calculated using a manually-delineated liver volume), were assessed. Compared with the contours generated with the Atlas method, the contours generated with the DL model had better agreement with the manually-delineated contours, which had larger DSCs (average: 0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.83 ± 0.10) and smaller MDAs (average: 1.8 ± 0.4 mm vs 7.1 ± 5.1 mm). The average RV and average RA calculated using the DL-model-generated volumes are 0.99 ± 0.03 and 1.00 ± 0.00, respectively. The DL segmentation model was able to identify and segment livers in the CT images and provide reliable results. It outperformed the Atlas method. The model can be applied for SIRT procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.